Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge): best ski resorts
List of the best ski resorts in the Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge) (33 test reports and 255 evaluations based on facts)
Best ski resort in the Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge)
The ski resort Arber is the best ski resort in the Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge). With 3.7 out of 5 stars, it has the highest rating in the Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge).
Evaluated by Skiresort.info, the world's largest evaluation and test portal for ski resorts.
Click here for rating process info
Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge): top ski resorts
- Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge) – limit to
Mountain ranges: 1. Bavarian Forest (Bayerische Wald) , 2. Rothaar Mountains (Rothaargebirge) , 2. Fichtel Mountains (Fichtelgebirge) , 2. German Ore Mountains (Deutsches Erzgebirge) , 5. Harz , 6. Rhön Mountains , 7. Lenne Mountains , 8. Thuringian Forest (Thüringer Wald) , 9. Spessart , 9. Eifel , 9. Gladenbach Uplands , 9. Westerwald , 9. Hunsrück , 9. Vogelsberg Mountains , 9. Knüllgebirge , 16. Odenwald , 16. Fulda-Werra-Bergland , 16. Habichtswald , 19. Plackwald , 19. Taunus , 19. Iserlohner Höhe , 19. Kellerwald , 19. Lippe Uplands , 19. Solling
Superordinate mountain systems: 1. Süder Uplands (Süderbergland) , 2. Thuringian-Franconian Highlands , 3. Weser Uplands (Weserbergland)
Central Uplands of Germany (Deutsche Mittelgebirge) – switch toCross-border mountain ranges: 1. Sudetes (Sudety) , 2. Ore Mountains (Erzgebirge) , 2. Rhenish Massif (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge) , 4. Oberpfälzer Wald , 5. Vogtland
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
Highlights (5 from 18 evaluation criteria)
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts
among others: Size, slope offering, ski lifts